User talk:Hectorthebat

Welcome

Hello Hectorthebat and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Links

Hi Hector,

Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links)#Free links. It isn't helpful to link every word. For example, this edit didn't improve the article in question at all. In another example, you linked MMORPG Runescape when the correct link, RuneScape, was indicated one line above.

In short: read the Manual of Style, try to make sure your links are relevant, and try to link to the right article.

dbenbenn | talk 04:30, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hi. I'd like to ask you to be more careful and vigilent when wikilinking. I noticed you've been working through Wikipedia:Deadend pages, and several of your edits aren't fixing the articles. You often create links to individual words of a phrase (e.g., University of California, when it should be University of California), or you create links of the same word throughout an article (e.g., Europe in this edit). The idea of Wikipedia:Deadend pages is not just to make links, but also to cleanup the article, since many not-so-good articles appear on the list. See this discussion. Like the above comment in February suggested, please read and follow the Manual of Style on links. If you have any questions, please ask me. —Mar ka ci 2005-04-25 T 14:42 Z

Hector, I see that you continue to overlink articles, such as [1], in which you link to the letter A two times, and several other terms that really don't need to be linked to. Those additions don't add any value, and actually make the article harder to read. Please only link to terms that are actually relevant to the article. Also, when adding unknown dates to year articles, please follow the guidelines used on other year pages. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 14:18, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)

Hector you continue to overlink articles: [2]. The links to the initials A.V.C.C. are completely unnecessary and unhelpful. Let me stress that these edits are not helpful to other editors, and actually create misleading context. I know that you are just trying to go through Deadend pages, but you will be much better served by only linking to encyclopedic topics. Why don't you try categorizing these deadend pages and marking them as stubs when appropriate? --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 17:32, May 3, 2005 (UTC)

Hector. Your recent edit [3] shows the same pattern of behavior. I can't tell if you honestly think that you're improving these articles, but I assure you that many of these edits are more disruptive than helpful. Please respond to me on my talk page, and explain your methodology, or I will open an RFC against you. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 19:48, May 5, 2005 (UTC)

Hector, your edits to "Gordon E.J. Hoke" and A.R. Bernard Sr. appear unnecessary. I believe you are still over-linking these articles with Rev. being linked to in the A.R. Bernard Sr. article are over the top and are not improving the article. Several other pages which you have edited are plagued with red-edits. Would it be possible to preview your edits and write short summaries to edits on all your pages. TheTallOne 23:07, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hector, your edits to the articles between 20th and 23rd February 2006 are unnecessary and I do not believe that you are taking in the comments met on this page. You still repetitively repeat linking the same words over again and links to surnames of the people in which the article is about is irrelevant. Art is linked to numberous time in the article Art Rupe which links to the subject of Art, rather than the person, Art Rupe. Theoretically, they should not be linked to at all as they should if they are to be linked, lead to the very article you are editing. TheTallOne 21:41, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hector, Please desist from this behavior immediately. You have been warned about this in the past. If you have questions about the appropriate level of linking, ask a more experienced admin. Your recent edits are not constructive. --DDG 21:57, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2880 edit

Your edit to 2880 is not logical. First, an article there would have to be about the year 2880, not the number; the proper title for an article about the number is 2880 (number). Second, your statement that it is the smallest number with 36 factors is not true, 1260 is. Third, your edit was simply no more than a simple substub. Georgia guy 23:56, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it wasn't Hectorthebat who replaced the redirect with a false statement. Look at the history. DanielCristofani 11:02, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

edit summaries

It would be helpful if in your edit summaries you put something as simple as +Shane Mack. cheers, Kingturtle 16:04, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Removal without comments - copyright violations.

Please do not remove redlinks from the Catholic encyclopedia missing articles project without comments as to why you are removing them. I have notified admins and will be watching for other changes. I have also noticed that some of your contribution have been identified as copyright violations from the Oxford Dictionary of Saints. Please only use public domain sources such as the Catholic Encyclopedia which is freely available. Reflex Reaction 13:54, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing. If you do use the Catholic Encyclopedia as it looks like you are starting to do, please put {{Catholic}} at the bottom of the page. This will let other people know that the text is from a public domain source and not a copyright violation. But you should also know that direct text dumps are not the best way to add information to wikipedia. Please edit and modernize the articles, thing have changed alot since 1908. The instructions at the Nuttall Encyclopedia project are also excellent if you are looking for guidance. If you do not have time to edit the article, please put {{cleanup-date|October 2005}} at the top of the page so that other people know to clean up your work, though it is best if you can clean up after yourself. Thanks and keep contributing. Reflex Reaction 14:42, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hector thank you for wikifying and adding {{cleanup-date|October 2005}} to the articles you create from the Catholic Encyclopdia; it will make cleaning up the entries easier, but it is always best if you can clean up after yourself. Can you please be more selective about what information you put into wikipedia from the CE? Not all of the entries in the CE should be in wikipedia because they cover such specialty information and often have very POV info. Most of the articles are not up to date, either syntatically or the information they have. The CE's strengths for entry into wikipedia are often historical persons such as Saints or other Catholic persons who have made contributions outside the religious sphere such as Richard Bulstrode who is in both the 1911 version of the Encyclopedia Britannica [4] and in the Catholic Encyclopedia [5]. You may want to start at this crossover list for places to compile information from when creating articles. If you use information from the 1911 encyclopedia use the {{1911}} template --Reflex Reaction 21:08, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contintued work incorporating information from the Catholic Encyclopedia into Wikipedia. But I would again remind you to please DO NOT put dump text from the site into the pages. The Catholic encyclopedia was written at a different time and with different motivations than that of wikipedia. The material is simply not appropriate as it is from the site. You can use both the {{1911}} if you are going to use both sources for writing the article, which I had hoped that you had done. Can you also be more selective about words that need to be wikified, not everything is directly relevant to an article.

If you are interested in another project where material can be taken directly from a website, wikified, and be a much more complete article please contact me. Thanks, --Reflex Reaction 15:28, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting Amitz

Hi, because you were involved with the article, you may want to look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amitiz (2nd nomination), best wishes, IZAK 14:51, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Sigs

Thanks for helping out removing signatures from articles. Lately, it seems like I've been the only one really doing it. Keep it up! -Royalguard11^Talk 16:34, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AIB

I noticed the re-edit of Afghanistan International Bank, I check the differences i did not notice any spicific changes, if you have rewritten anything, please let me know on my Talk page

Joey AFG 15:05, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arne Løchen

A tag has been placed on Arne Løchen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 16:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Georg von Kopp

Hi Hectorthebat,

I noticed you recently created the article about Georg von Kopp. I just wanted to let you know that you can announce any new Germany-related articles at Portal:Germany/New article announcements and Portal:Germany/New articles. That way other users interested in the topic can see them and might improve them.

You may also be interested in the WikiProject Germany.

Thanks,

--Carabinieri

Kjersti Bronken Senderud

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Kjersti Bronken Senderud, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.162.59.230 00:46, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

unhelpful Linking

Hi, Some of your recent links are unhelpful of just plain wrong. Can I suggest that you check them first. For example, in Glastonbury Canal you link to Richard Pratt which is a disambig page; in Daylight magazine, Joel Engle and Mr. and Mrs. Bridge you link to Richard Ros - he was born in 1429 so he is hardly likely to be a photographer, nor is he likely to go on tour, nor play jazz. You run the risk of being regarded as a vandal; I hope that that is very far from your intentions.Pyrotec —Preceding comment was added at 21:54, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Richard A. Pittman

Richard A. Pittman is US Marine and a Vietnam veteran, born in 1945, yet may of your edits today Special:Contributions/Hectorthebat on horse racing link to him. See here Special:Whatlinkshere/Richard A. Pittman. What are you doing? Pyrotec 22:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing links to point to the wrong articles. You've clearly been questioned on this before - if you keep it up, you're likely to get a warning block. Rebecca 23:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone through and reverted the links. The Richard Pitman of the horse racing articles is a British jockey, notable in 1970s steeplechase racing and also a tv commentator.Bcp67 07:01, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Trondheim Kunstorkester

A tag has been placed on Trondheim Kunstorkester requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TonyBallioni 13:58, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

?

Andrew Corlett has been recently editted. Can you explain the last change? I don't understand why data has been deleted. Could you restore it if it is an error. Thanks Victuallers (talk) 09:47, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Power

Hi! I updated the article about this fruit wine (I didn't even had the chance to taste…) and found only sparse information. It even seems that the product is no more sold by the Vinmonopol.
As you look like someone who travel to Norway (but I may be wrong), could you see some bottle of it recently, do you have more information — I spent Christmas time onboard the Hurtigrute and no one was able to answer me. Bye! Thanks for answering. ✓ Kanġi Oĥanko (talk) 22:35, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NBA

Thank you for the help on Anthony Tolliver. I didn't quite know how to word that. Are you a member of the NBA's WikiProject? Basketball one 10 01:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Thanks for all your work here. This is just a plea, as another contributor to this page, to use edit summaries. Please consider it as it helps others. Thanks! MSGJ (talk) 20:01, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of AB/CD

A tag has been placed on AB/CD requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Zenlax ^T ^C ^S 19:56, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Too Many Lovers

I have nominated Too Many Lovers, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Too Many Lovers. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 22:37, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A. E. Dor

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article A. E. Dor, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? DoubleBlue (Talk) 15:37, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation

Please don't create a disambiguation page for articles until such time as at least one of those articles exists. Thank you. DS (talk) 21:08, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Jack Cutting, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 14:59, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stub tags at end, please

Hi, Please add stub tags at the end of articles, not at the beginning as you did for Florian Cazalot - it makes life easier for people doing stub-sorting. See WP:STUB which says "By convention this is placed at the end of the article, after the External links section, any navigation templates, and the category tags, so that the stub category will appear last." Thanks, PamD (talk) 21:42, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Urinary meatus

A tag has been placed on Urinary meatus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. frogger3140 (talk) 23:14, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Lise Karlsnes

A tag has been placed on Lise Karlsnes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:20, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vegar Landro

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Vegar Landro, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rettetast (talk) 20:28, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yasunori Miyoshi

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Yasunori Miyoshi, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.museunacional.ufrj.br/mndi/Aracnologia/pdfliteratura/papers%20miyoshi.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:40, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Yasunori Miyoshi

A tag has been placed on Yasunori Miyoshi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Alexnia (If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page.) @ 17:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject France newsletter

WikiProject France News

What's new?

The project has recently experienced a complete redesign. The Outreach department has also undergone a major expansion, and this newsletter is the result of that.
The review department is currently under development, with several new proposals underway. Internal peer review had begun on the page of the project's Review Department. The department currently provides a centralized platform off all currently open reviews throughout the project (Featured Articles, Peer Reviews, Good Articles, Articles for Deletion, Categories for Discussion, etc.)
A new task force has been introduced: the Paris task force. Any users interested in contributing to the taskforce can join on the project page.
There is a current discussion about merging the French Communes WikiProject into ours. This communes project will be organised as a task force.

User-related news

Notifications

Several new user has joined the project this last month: Jordan Timothy James Busson, Djwilms and Mcewan. Welcome! Please come stop by the talk page to join in our discussions.
Lazulilasher has been awarded the French Barnstar of National Merit for his contributions to this project. Congratulations!

Complete project tasks

Complete To Do List

The following is a list of all the current tasks for the project, as well as several project goals:

Wikipedia:France-related tasks

You can help! Vous pouvez aider !

Here are some France related tasks you can do

Requests: Gérard Garouste – Émile Peynot – more...
Translation from French:See TRANSWIKI/French for details. fr:Formation territoriale de la France métropolitaine to Territorial formation of France – Loi constitutionnelle du 23 juillet 2008 to French constitutional law of 23 July 2008 – fr:Arbel Fauvet Rail to Arbel Fauvet Rail – fr:Merir to Merir – more...
Stubs: Category:France stubs
Category sorting: Category:French writers – Category:History of France
Verify or Factual Accuracy: Gui de Ceriz – Rennes-le-Château – Simone Weil
Update: Bischwiller
NPOV : Foreign relations of France (Middle East section) – Torture during the Algerian War – François Mitterrand – Jean-Marie_Le_Pen – John Calvin – Marie Antoinette
Wikify: Dida Diafat – French architecture
Citations: Vichy France (section) – Falaise pocket – Charles de Gaulle – Vaux-le-Vicomte – Economy of France – Louisiana Purchase
Merge: – Bourbon Family Compact
Copyedit, Style or Cleanup: Antoine de la Sale – Albert Camus – Breton language – Claude Debussy – French Revolution – French language – Jean-Paul Sartre – Napoleon III of France – Nicolas Sarkozy – Picardy – Rennes – Sarah Bernhardt – Toulouse – Girondist – Louis XIV
Expand: Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen – Vaux-le-Vicomte – Basque language – Being and Nothingness
France-related Wikiprojects: Wikipedia:WikiProject France

view • edit • discuss • history • watch

Overview
This is the new project newsletter, covering months August through to October, which will contain information regarding new Good and Featured articles, recent project changes, general related news, and recent proposals. If you've just joined, add your name to the Members section of Wikipedia:WikiProject France. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the creation. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
Articles
Five articles are currently undergoing external peer reviews: Louvre Abu Dhabi Louvre Family Moving Day Napoleon I List of Bellflower Bunny Episodes Two articles have reached GA status this month: Daft Punk Louvre Abu Dhabi
Newsletter contributors
Jordan Timothy James Busson

Thanks for your contributions to the project, Jor dan ^Contribs 17:31, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strange coincidence

Could have sworn you were User:AlbertHerring. Just I was tagging some of the French senators he started earlier and noticed he had looked at Faroese people and then a Faroese politician. Then shortly afterwards seemed a coincidence that you started stubbing them. Ah I see now he was correcting an article you had just started which explains it. Perhaps great minds think alike, but I was sure I somehow connected you with him in the past. Anyway, glad that those red links were removed. Best. Count Blofeld 23:04, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Ryker's

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ryker's, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ryker's seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ryker's, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 22:50, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish village articles

Hi Hectorthebat, A lot of the articles that you have created (and the ones that you will create) would benefit greatly from the addition of {{Infobox Settlement}} as I did with Strömsfors. Most of the time you can look up the coordinates and elevation on Google Earth. Happy Editing. —MJCdetroit ^(yak) 17:59, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki links

Hello Hectorthebat, very nice that you add interwiki links to your articles, such as those for Swedish villages. However, don't forget to add iw-links in the other direction as well, such as [[en:Ornäs]] in the Swedish article. This should always be the case with "symmetric" articles (on the same subject, having the same coverage) in two language versions. As I understand it, interwiki-links in both directions make it possible for the interwiki bots to add correct links to other language versions; if a link only exists in one direction the bot-assisted update usually doesn't work. Regards, Tomas e (talk) 09:59, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just realised that you probably created these articles from the nowiki versions, rather than the svwiki versions. Since you added iw-links in both directions between enwiki and nowiki, the updates should work, so you can ignore my previous comment. It just hadn't struck me that someone would create articles on Swedish villages from Norwegian rather than Swedish source text... Tomas e (talk) 10:04, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indonesia

Hi Hector. Glad to see you developing iNdonesia but can you please not categorise articles in "Towns in INdonesia". PLease see Category:Cities, towns and villages in Indonesia and decide which of the sub cats the articles should go in. PLease empty the towns category, they should go in Category:Cities, towns and villages in Banten thanks Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 22:30, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Blofield is too kind - when creating stubs without a WP:RS in sight - please - the least you could do is to put a tag on the talk page - thanks if and when you do! - WP Indonesia class=stub importance=low - otherwise it is in effect an orphan in the cat department. Indonesia project does not need more articles that are WP:RS free - it is a scourge - and any help by either utilising a web or paper based source is better than the hundreds of place names with nothing to support the stub - cheers and thanks Satu Suro 09:22, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arnulf Paulsen

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Arnulf Paulsen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unreferenced WP:BIO, unimproved since 9/07 tagging, not independently notable of Vazelina bilopphøggers.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. THF (talk) 14:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Truck-driving country

I have nominated Truck-driving country, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truck-driving country. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 18:54, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Fit TV, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 15:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

COunty templates

Hi the idea is that you format the template with the countrie sin the list. Template:County-level divisions of Jiangxi needs to be edited first. You need to copy and paste the districts/counties under each provincial city. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 15:05, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oddbjørn Lie

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Oddbjørn Lie, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Plays on the second tier in Norway. Not a fully professional league. Fails WP:ATHLETE. No other significant coverage that fulfills WP:BIO#basic criteria.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rettetast (talk) 22:16, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Come Closer

A tag has been placed on Come Closer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Seegoon (talk) 17:17, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nicolas Burtin

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Nicolas Burtin. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:13, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Justin Savornin

A tag has been placed on Justin Savornin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 18:41, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aage Indahl

A tag has been placed on Aage Indahl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mixwell!^Talk 19:11, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roads in Oslo

I'd ask you to please reconsider adding stubs about small roads in Oslo. They may not be notable. Geschichte (talk) 07:42, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of World Forum of Fish Harvesters and Fish Workers

I have nominated World Forum of Fish Harvesters and Fish Workers, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Forum of Fish Harvesters and Fish Workers. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Geronimo20 (talk) 23:01, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leonel Almeida

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Leonel Almeida, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.speedylook.com/Leonel_Almeida.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:46, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tina Weirather

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Tina Weirather. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:17, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Corinna Körting

A tag has been placed on Corinna Körting requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tad Lincoln (talk) 22:57, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wenche Olsen

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Wenche Olsen. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to sign that. Translating unreferenced articles has little value to the project. The formatting does not have to perfect. Just give the plain links inside some ref tags or as links at the bittom at the article. Rettetast (talk) 11:59, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Diocese of Aberdeen

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Diocese of Aberdeen. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diocese of Aberdeen. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Carole Gaessler

Hi,

Please add a credit after translation...

Thanks in advance !--Bapti (talk) 21:14, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leivur Øssursson

Hello. You created Leivur Øssursson and i noticed that one of the wlinks, Magnus Olafsson, goes to a 13th century king of Mann. That can't be right, it must be another Magnus Olafsson; but I don't know my Norwegian kings. Could you direct the wlink to the correct king? Hmm, does Gille refer to Gilli (prime minister)?--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 12:15, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zanka Flow

A tag has been placed on Zanka Flow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ╟─Treasury Tag►co-prince─╢ 17:55, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Patrice Godin

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Patrice Godin, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.juuh.com/Patrice_Godin. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:10, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Patrice Godin

A tag has been placed on Patrice Godin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Falcon8765 (talk) 01:27, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Benoni Auran

Can you provide references for the Benoni Auran article? Also, you may want to read up on WP:MOS, since this article didn't follow the manual of style, including date linking. Also, the stub tag should not be placed at the top of the article. Thanks, PDCook (talk) 18:47, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is crucial that you reference your articles, such as Ekko av Ibsen. Please either start doing it or respond to this message, or I'll be forced to take further action. Ironholds (talk) 17:56, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. Start referencing, or WP:ANI is the next step. Ironholds (talk) 09:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Blue Heaven (manga). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. PDCook (talk) 17:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I am reminding you that the stub tags go at the bottom of articles. Also please be aware that wikiproject tags belong on the talk pages of articles, not the article itself. PDCook (talk) 17:04, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should review Wikipedia:Stub, as the Francisco Antequera also had the stub tag placed at the top of the article. PDCook (talk) 17:08, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Opplysningskontoret for kjøtt

The article Opplysningskontoret for kjøtt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable organization

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PDCook (talk) 17:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources needed

Sources are needed for: Eberhard Jüngel and Piet du Toit. PDCook (talk) 17:13, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Date linking

Note that generally dates are not to be linked in WP articles such as you did in Arne Lindtner Næss and Jacques Decour. I have unlinked those dates, but you perhaps should check out the dates section of WP:MOS. Regards, PDCook (talk) 17:25, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marita Skammelsrud Lund

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Marita Skammelsrud Lund. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

coordinates for railway stations

When using {{Coord}} to code coordinates of railway stations, please use type:railwaystation instead of type:landmark. --Stepheng3 (talk) 22:50, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yves Huts

Reliable and dependent sources are needed for the Yves Huts article. PDCook (talk) 21:45, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coen Janssen needs additional references as well, since the only ones given are the official site and a fan site. PDCook (talk) 21:54, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Hectorthebat! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 61 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 28 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Iain Dilthey - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jiří Javorský - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Gordon Forbes - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Barbara Scofield - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Georg Monsen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Nils Ove Hellvik - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Monika Hauser - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Harald Bjarne Slettebø - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Liz Wardley - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jan Arvid Johansen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...

11. Johan Eriksson

12. Erich Ott

13. Aasmund Nordstoga

14. Kjell Håkonsen

15. Silvia Schenker

16. Nicolas Burtin

17. Heikki Turunen

18. José Florencio Guzmán

19. Svein Lilleberg

20. Hallvard Flatland

21. Shea Farrell

22. Nabil Daoudi

23. Christophe Boutin

24. Jean Rabasse

25. Claude Bergeaud

26. Renos Doweiya

27. Dag Vågsås

28. Daniel Gisiger

29. Amar Ghoul

30. Richard Leduc

31. Inger Edelfeldt

32. Harri Mänty

33. Øystein Bache

34. Florian Cazalot

35. Svein Sturla Hungnes

36. Jan Lundgren

37. Marita Liabø

38. Mattis Mathiesen

39. Dag Danielsen

40. Tommy Rovelstad

41. Pavlina Filipova

42. Tor Arne Andreassen

43. Audun Kleive

44. Florence Picaut

45. Claude Bourquard

46. Paul Bjerke

47. Tor Berger Jørgensen

48. Alain Lestié

49. Didier Bezace

50. Stian Ohr

51. Erik Vea

52. Evans David Gliwitzki

53. Sune Wentzel

54. Thor Sørheim

55. Håkon Rege

56. Mette Veiseth

57. Sondre Meisfjord

58. Jarle Vespestad

59. Julien Robert

60. Sébastien Hinault

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 11:05, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notability Yves Huts - article deleted

I have deleted the above named article as notability has not been established. Should you have third-party references that detail the notability of Yves Huts - aside from his being a part of a band then you can recreate the article - providing the references are added.--VirtualSteve ^{need admin support?} 02:52, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notability Coen Janssen - article deleted

I have deleted the above named article as notability has not been established. Should you have third-party references that detail the notability of Coen Janssen - aside from his being a part of a band then you can recreate the article - providing the references are added.--VirtualSteve ^{need admin support?} 02:54, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notability referencing issues

It is important that you provide valid references in relation to any article that you create in the future, and in the case of BLP (biographies) created in the past, that you go now back and provide those references. Unfortunately in the case of biographies where you have not established notability it is likely the case that I will delete the articles unless you respond quite quickly with references. Please remember that references must be appropriate, that is not via the use of blogs or other invalid links. I also note that you have been asked for your cooperation in this regard before and you seem to be ignoring such calls. I am not sure why you are but I need to caution you not to create any new article in the future that does not meeting notability guidelines.--VirtualSteve ^{need admin support?} 03:11, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article layout, MOS, etc

Greetings. I've noticed that you've been having trouble with the layout and usage of various templates/infoboxes with the articles you've been creating (such as: Riksvei 171, Riksvei 174, Riksvei 181, Sand, Akershus). While other editors and I have been cleaning some of these issues up, it would be better if you could take care of these issues up as you create the articles. It would be helpful if you reviewed Wikipedia's guidelines regarding layout, manual of style, and Infobox MOS. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or leave a message at the help desk. Regards, PDCook (talk) 05:05, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I am pointing out that two new articles you created, Riksvei 120 and Riksvei 22 have issues that need to be cleaned up. Please, it would be helpful if you understood how to properly build infoboxes and cite your sources. PDCook (talk) 00:12, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What country?

When you create new articles about places, railway stations, roads, etc., please can you remember to state what country they are in. Thanks. Bazonka (talk) 20:39, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Moris

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Anthony Moris. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please follow WP:MOS, WP:BLP

I implore you to properly reference every biography of a living person you write. Futhermore, please read and undrstand WP:MOS. I grow tired of fixing your mistakes. PDCook (talk) 00:14, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disruptive editing - you have been asked many, many times to stop creating short unreferenced stub articles - upon your return please ensure you work towards becoming a part of the community and discussing matters - not just ignoring repeated requests. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. --VirtualSteve ^{need admin support?} 00:50, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IIHF

Thank you so much for your contributions to the IIHF world championship articles, really very good work. Where's your source? I'm trying to compile a list of WC's by attendance and can't find tourney info past 1989. Thanks. Slaja (talk) 04:31, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for repeating the behavior that led to the previous block. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. NW (Talk) 00:19, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ahyee Aye Elvis

Hello, could you please take a look at Ahyee Aye Elvis? The link you have added as the only reference doesn't seem to work. Also, if you can get it to work, it looks like a Norwegian website. That's allowed, but do you know of any sources for this person in English? Thanks, --Beloved Freak 18:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

For continuing the behaviour that led to your two recent blocks, you are blocked indefinitely until you can assure us this behaviour will not continue. Please appeal by using {{unblock}}, or e-mailing unblock-en-llists.wikimedia.org. Thank you. PeterSymonds (talk) 19:49, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 2 Faces

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is 2 Faces. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2 Faces. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:03, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hectorthebat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise, no more unreferenced articles.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:06, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Yasunori Miyoshi

The article Yasunori Miyoshi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Yasunori Miyoshi – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 20:42, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User's pie-chart of edits

It's been suggested that this user may have resumed their activities & MO on different account(s).

It may be interesting to compare their pie-chart of edits with Hectorthebat's pie-chart of edits.

Notice how seldom Hectorthebat used talk pages - and never their own - and never supplied Edit Summaries.

Hectorthebat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) -

Regards, Trafford09 (talk) 13:28, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About your article

Speedy deletion nomination of Flerohopp

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Flerohopp, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Rönneskolan (talk) 16:31, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robin Ruzan for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Robin Ruzan, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Ruzan until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:27, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Leonel Almeida

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Leonel Almeida requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ironholds (talk) 15:50, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Silvia Schenker

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Silvia Schenker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Alexf^(talk) 21:18, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Richard Leduc

The article Richard Leduc has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. No references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Frotz (talk) 04:31, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hectorthebat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi everyone. I have been blocked for the best part of a year, and I feel that this block is no longer necessary. While I understand that I have created a large number of unreferenced biographical articles, and have not contributed to the dialogue which has been attempted, I feel that this block has served its purpose. As you can see from a list of articles which I have created, a very large number of these have been useful translations of important articles from the .fr and .no wikipedias, and I feel that I can continue to do this without translating unreferenced articles. Therefore, I understand what I have been blocked for, I will not continue to cause damage, and I will make useful contributions to Wikipedia, with edit summaries, and reply to messages sent to me.

Decline reason:

I have examined a random sample of the 1418 articles you have created. (That includes both deleted articles and articles still in existence.) I have also looked through the history of your talk page. In the course of these investigations I discovered a number of problems. There were some cases of copyright infringement of which you were informed, and I have also found further, apparently hitherto undetected, copyright infringement, with whole articles being verbatim copies of pages from other web sites. You have received messages about various types of unconstructive editing, such as creating disambiguation pages where no article exists for any of the entries. Even among the undeleted articles there are many on subjects which seem to come nowhere near satisfying Wikipedia's inclusion standards, and few if any are on very significant subjects. Thus, although creating unreferenced articles (many, but not all, biographical) is the problem which has most often been pointed out, there are other problems, which you have not acknowledged in your unblock request. Adding this to the fact that you persistently completely ignored warnings about the problems, even after receiving two short blocks, I am not convinced that unblocking you would on balance be an advantage to Wikpedia. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:19, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unfortunately the blocking administrator has not edited in the last few days. I will wait a couple more days, and if there is still no response I will make a decision myself. Sorry to keep you waiting, but after "the best part of a year" perhaps you can tolerate a couple more days. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:15, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- Ha ha, thanks, I'm sure I can. Hectorthebat (talk) 14:43, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can I challenge your declining? While I accept that a number of articles were lifted from the Catholic Encyclopaedia, this has now been dealt with, and I did not do this for a number of years before I was blocked. Subsequent 'hits' of copyright infringement were only picked up when I translated an article from French or Norwegian Wikipedias, and they were copyright infringements which I unknowingly translated. Is there in fact anything that I can do to get myself unblocked, or is this permanent with no chance of reprieve? Hectorthebat (talk) 14:29, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What a smooth move!

Do not create, add, or restore hoaxes to Wikipedia., such as you did with the article .22 Eargesplitten Loudenboomer. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:24, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- This was not a hoax, as a simple Google search would have confirmed, or putting in articles for deletion would have shown. As I am blocked from editing Wikipedia, I cannot reinstate it, but I would be grateful if you could do so. Hectorthebat (talk) 09:22, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

Added header. AGK [•] 23:08, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hectorthebat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to request an unblock again. I still feel that I have a lot to offer the site, and a look at some of my contributions will show that I have created a lot of important articles, as well as helping to improve others. There is a meetup coming to my town that I would like to attend, and I would like to do so as an unblocked editor. Many of my unreferenced or non-notable creations were translations which were included in the Norwegian or French wikis. I therefore assumed that they would be acceptable here. I will not make that mistake again, and will ensure that I spend more time and attention on any further edits.Hectorthebat (talk) 12:43, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm all for second chances, but you have already had yours and you apparently learned nothing from it. This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Read our guide to improving articles
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
• do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
• do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
• do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
• do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), place at the end of the prose you copied this template {{reflist-talk}} and then save.

Now, edit that content to propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:37, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Claude Aubry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Claude Aubry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claude Aubry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:14, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 0/6

The article 0/6 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability guideline WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tentinator 16:15, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tore Elias Hoel

The article Tore Elias Hoel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP with no sources (article too old for BLP PROD), almost no content other than an image and list of works, notability not established

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhododendrites (talk) 19:42, 31 October 2013 (UTC) Rhododendrites (talk) 19:42, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Constantin Brâncoveanu University

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Constantin Brâncoveanu University requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TLSuda (talk) 19:18, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2 Bal

The article 2 Bal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTABILITY could not be established and does not have a French-language article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:44, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sud Nivernais Imphy Decize for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sud Nivernais Imphy Decize is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sud Nivernais Imphy Decize until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SageGreenRider (talk) 02:51, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fit TV for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fit TV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fit TV until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 00:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adam Friedman

The article Adam Friedman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No apparent notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 06:21, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AIM Productions

The article AIM Productions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence at all that this is a notable company. Looking for "AIM productions" Hove (since there are other companies of the same name, e.g. in Texas) produced no Google News results at all, and regular Google and Google books at first glance gave no indepth secondary sources either. As far as I can tell, this is a company with one location and less than ten employees.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:42, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cecilie Broch Knudsen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cecilie Broch Knudsen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cecilie Broch Knudsen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 14:47, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sekkoïa

The article Sekkoïa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:33, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Christen Smed

The article Christen Smed has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources found covering this person. This person thus fails WP:NBIO, as tagged since August 2008.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:46, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Spikeld

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Spikeld requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an individual animal, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WWGB (talk) 04:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Spikeld

The article Spikeld has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, unable to establish notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 12:48, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of ecclesiastical abbreviations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of ecclesiastical abbreviations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ecclesiastical abbreviations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:08, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Hanes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Hanes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Hanes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 18:59, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sofie Cappelen

The article Sofie Cappelen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sam Walton (talk) 18:49, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Careers advisor

The article Careers advisor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this occupation/job/position is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:22, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Guy Autret de Missirien

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Guy Autret de Missirien to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Rogermx (talk) 19:26, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gudesens Conditori

The article Gudesens Conditori has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for 10 years; I have looked for sources but the only things I find other than Wikipedia clones are one or two brief mentions of the show in sources discussing the host.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. bonadea contributions talk 16:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ACWL

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ACWL requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Carwile2 ^{*Shoot me a message*} 21:00, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abraham in the Catholic liturgy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abraham in the Catholic liturgy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham in the Catholic liturgy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Beland (talk) 20:34, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sofie Cappelen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sofie Cappelen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sofie Cappelen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SL93 (talk) 20:48, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Henri Serruys for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Henri Serruys is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henri Serruys until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 15:45, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chance or Coincidence

The article Chance or Coincidence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews found in a BEFORE. Minor award

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 18:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A. J. Henderson

The article A. J. Henderson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Ferien (talk) 15:54, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jean Leclercq (politician)

The article Jean Leclercq (politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Ferien (talk) 15:58, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of I søkelyset

The article I søkelyset has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable, nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2019

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:47, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of I søkelyset

The article I søkelyset has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 20:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Måltid for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Måltid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Måltid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

– bradv 13:15, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Deuxième Bureau (Morocco)

The article Deuxième Bureau (Morocco) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources found except Wikipedia mirrors. Unsourced in fr.wiki and ar.wiki as well.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 01:23, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Face à face

The article Face à face has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Herfra til evigheten

The article Herfra til evigheten has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is unsourced, a Google search returns no sources to prove notability, the Norwegian bokmal version is also unsourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spinixster (trout me!) 02:58, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nicolas Agnesi

The article Nicolas Agnesi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable rugby player, fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Primefac (talk) 12:21, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Synste Møre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Synste Møre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synste Møre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 19:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Links

2880 edit

edit summaries

Removal without comments - copyright violations.

Deleting Amitz

Removing Sigs

AIB

Arne Løchen

Kjersti Bronken Senderud

unhelpful Linking

Richard A. Pittman

Speedy deletion of Trondheim Kunstorkester

?

Edit summaries

Speedy deletion of AB/CD

AfD nomination of Too Many Lovers

Proposed deletion of A. E. Dor

Disambiguation

June 2008

Stub tags at end, please

Speedy deletion of Urinary meatus

Speedy deletion of Lise Karlsnes

Proposed deletion of Vegar Landro

Speedy deletion of Yasunori Miyoshi

WikiProject France newsletter

What's new?

Notifications

Strange coincidence

Notability of Ryker's

Swedish village articles

Interwiki links

Indonesia

Proposed deletion of Arnulf Paulsen

AfD nomination of Truck-driving country

March 2009

COunty templates

Proposed deletion of Oddbjørn Lie

Speedy deletion nomination of Come Closer

Speedy deletion nomination of Justin Savornin

Speedy deletion nomination of Aage Indahl

Roads in Oslo

Articles for deletion nomination of World Forum of Fish Harvesters and Fish Workers

Speedy deletion nomination of Corinna Körting

AfD nomination of Diocese of Aberdeen

Speedy deletion nomination of Zanka Flow

Speedy deletion nomination of Patrice Godin

January 2010

Proposed deletion of Opplysningskontoret for kjøtt

Sources needed

Date linking

More articles needed references

coordinates for railway stations

Unreferenced BLPs

Notability Yves Huts - article deleted

Notability Coen Janssen - article deleted

Notability referencing issues

Article layout, MOS, etc

What country?

Please follow WP:MOS, WP:BLP

February 2010

IIHF

Ahyee Aye Elvis

Blocked indefinitely

AfD nomination of 2 Faces

Proposed deletion of Yasunori Miyoshi

User's pie-chart of edits

About your article

Speedy deletion nomination of Flerohopp

Nomination of Robin Ruzan for deletion

Speedy deletion nomination of Leonel Almeida

Speedy deletion nomination of Silvia Schenker

Proposed deletion of Richard Leduc

Unblock request

What a smooth move!

Unblock request

Nomination of Claude Aubry for deletion

Proposed deletion of 0/6

Proposed deletion of Tore Elias Hoel

Speedy deletion nomination of Constantin Brâncoveanu University